Subject: DLUs/r Names

From: [email-masked] (Paul Gacek)
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 93 11:13:11 PDT

Good point about the 6.2 Dependent LUs. Maybe we should have something
that implies coverage of LUs 1, 2, 3 and 6.2 but excludes 4 and 7?
 
Paul Gacek
Novell - Internetworking Products Division
[email-masked]
408 321 1288

---

From: John Pickens <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 93 17:43:56 -0700

How about DLUPU2R and DLUPU2S?
 
JP

  Paul Gacek